IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Carroll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Houston Bulls NAHL 53 4 14 18 0.340 0.1248 0.1248 0.3584 0.3584
2021-22 — NAHL 55 14 45 59 1.073 0.3941 0.3717 1.1322 1.0679
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC JR 5 3 2 5 1.000
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC SO 20 5 5 10 0.500
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC FR 14 2 4 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2022-23 · Utica
+34.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15174
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 2001
#727
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Bellant
Adrian · 2017-18
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Stewart
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Everson
Utica · 2016-17
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.