← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Hockley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-03 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 44 1 4 5 0.114 0.0423 0.0431 0.1655 0.1685
2024-25 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 23 8 16 24 1.044 0.3887 0.3763 1.5205 1.4720
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.1148 0.1031 0.6155 0.5530
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC 23 1 3 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2024-25 · Quinnipiac
+327.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7584
Defenseman overall
#1799
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.