← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Ziprick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-08 Country: Canada
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 33 1 11 12 0.364 0.0700 0.0810 0.2298 0.2659
2022-23 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 30 0 1 1 0.033 0.0162 0.0175 0.0813 0.0876
2023-24 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 54 1 8 9 0.167 0.0811 0.0834 0.4072 0.4188
2024-25 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 68 12 36 48 0.706 0.3434 0.3348 1.7243 1.6813
2025-26 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 68 20 36 56 0.824 0.4006 0.3721 2.0116 1.8683
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3103
Defenseman overall
#787
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL 2025-26
0.69
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
WHL 2023-24
0.50
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
NAHL 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
NAHL 2013-14
0.24
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2009-10
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2010-11
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.