← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Harsanyi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-10 Country: Canada
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 68 12 16 28 0.412 0.2003 0.2169 1.0104 1.0942
2024-25 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 37 12 12 24 0.649 0.3155 0.3248 1.5915 1.6385
2025-26 Saskatoon Blades WHL 57 14 20 34 0.597 0.2902 0.2853 1.4636 1.4391
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18277
Forward overall
#526
Forward born in 2007
#665
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2015-16
0.57
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
NAHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2021-22
0.51
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2001-02
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.