← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Harsanyi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-10 Country: Canada
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 68 12 16 28 0.412 0.2003 0.2169 1.0059 1.0894
2024-25 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 37 12 12 24 0.649 0.3155 0.3248 1.5843 1.6311
2025-26 Saskatoon Blades WHL 57 14 20 34 0.597 0.2902 0.2853 1.4571 1.4327
2026-27 Saskatoon Blades WHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.1946 0.1946 0.9771 0.9771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18569
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 2007
#712
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2015-16
0.15
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.