← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 39 5 14 19 0.487 0.1790 0.2006 0.5142 0.5761
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 58 9 10 19 0.328 0.1933 0.2001 0.9839 1.0183
2014-15 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 7 14 21 0.356 0.2099 0.2069 1.0689 1.0537
2015-16 Omaha Lancers USHL 51 11 11 22 0.431 0.2545 0.2391 1.2957 1.2171
2016-17 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 49 21 38 59 1.204 0.4639 0.4214 1.7523 1.5917
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Colorado College D1 NCHC 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colorado College D1 NCHC 14 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC 5 2 0 2 0.400
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC 26 3 1 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2017-18 · Colorado College
-48.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12992
Forward overall
#518
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.