IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Dupont Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-05-28 Country: Canada
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Everett Silvertips WHL 64 17 43 60 0.938 0.4561 0.5238 2.3003 2.6419
2025-26 Everett Silvertips WHL 63 18 55 73 1.159 0.5637 0.6213 2.8431 3.1337
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1108
Defenseman overall
#11
Defenseman born in 2009
#123
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Ian McCoshen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Zach Werenski
NTDP-U18 2013-14
0.71
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Seamus Casey
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.78
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Cam York
NTDP-U18 2017-18
0.53
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Owen Power
USHL 2019-20
0.62
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.