IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shaun Rios Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-12 Country: USA
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 51 24 26 50 0.980 0.4770 0.4634 2.4056 2.3370
2025-26 Prince George Cougars WHL 31 5 6 11 0.355 0.1726 0.1597 0.8706 0.8055
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16291
Forward overall
#850
Forward born in 2005
#596
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Carter Randklev
USHL 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Brock Edwards
CCHL 2012-13
0.54
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Jack Billings
CCHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Nicolas Carrier
CCHL 2015-16
0.22
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Arrigoni
Hamline · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Pickering
Concordia · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Nickulas
Endicott · 2024-25
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.