← New Search ↗ Social Card

Savin Virk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-06 Country: Canada
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 50 12 9 21 0.420 0.1618 0.1831 0.6112 0.6915
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 50 22 24 46 0.920 0.4476 0.4698 2.2574 2.3696
2025-26 Tri-City Americans WHL 66 27 38 65 0.985 0.4791 0.4807 2.4164 2.4246
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8498
Forward overall
#172
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL-J20 2017-18
0.22
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
BCHL 2014-15
0.71
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
USHL 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
USHL 2018-19
0.67
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.