IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Savin Virk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-06 Country: Canada
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 50 12 9 21 0.420 0.1618 0.1831 0.6108 0.6910
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 50 22 24 46 0.920 0.4476 0.4698 2.2473 2.3590
2025-26 Tri-City Americans WHL 66 27 38 65 0.985 0.4791 0.4807 2.4056 2.4137
2026-27 Victoria Royals WHL 4 3 4 7 1.750 0.8514 0.8514 4.2747 4.2747
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8636
Forward overall
#184
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schilkey
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.70 D1 FR PPG)
0.71 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Guentzel
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Anthony Romani
OHL 2023-24
0.76
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Ryker Lee
USHL 2024-25
0.86
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.