← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kalder Varga Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-24 Country: USA
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kelowna Rockets WHL 58 10 14 24 0.414 0.2013 0.2219 1.0108 1.1142
2025-26 Kelowna Rockets WHL 68 21 16 37 0.544 0.2647 0.2795 1.3291 1.4035
2026-27 Red Deer Rebels WHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1622 0.1622 0.8142 0.8142
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23235
Forward overall
#393
Forward born in 2008
#871
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.41
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.23
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.35
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
1.517 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.