← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Corkish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-04 Country: USA
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Park of Cottage Grove USHS-MN 26 16 32 48 1.846 0.2337 0.2337 0.4483 0.4483
2023-24 Park of Cottage Grove USHS-MN 25 12 26 38 1.520 0.1924 0.1924 0.3691 0.3691
2024-25 Minnesota Mallards NAHL 10 0 3 3 0.300 0.1102 0.1210 0.3171 0.3482
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 68 12 20 32 0.471 0.2289 0.2296 1.1495 1.1531
2026-27 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 7 2 3 5 0.714 0.3475 0.3475 1.7448 1.7448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17498
Forward overall
#522
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHL 2020-21
0.53
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.