← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathieu Lajoie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-20 Country: Canada
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3354 0.3920 0.9254 1.0815
2024-25 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 40 5 18 23 0.575 0.1929 0.2152 0.5321 0.5936
2025-26 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 64 9 19 28 0.438 0.2128 0.2219 1.0735 1.1195
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27869
Forward overall
#426
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2019-20
1.06
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
BCHL 2016-17
0.40
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
OHL 2021-22
0.51
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.