← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathieu Lajoie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-20 Country: Canada
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3354 0.3920 0.9252 1.0813
2024-25 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 40 5 18 23 0.575 0.1929 0.2152 0.5320 0.5935
2025-26 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 64 9 19 28 0.438 0.2128 0.2219 1.0687 1.1145
2026-27 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 4 1 3 4 1.000 0.4865 0.4865 2.4427 2.4427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28240
Forward overall
#495
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2014-15
0.44
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
NAHL 2016-17
0.40
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
OHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
USHL 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.