IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Cloutier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Soo Greyhounds OHL 68 8 11 19 0.279 0.1616 0.1774 0.7316 0.8033
2022-23 Soo Greyhounds OHL 68 16 12 28 0.412 0.2382 0.2513 1.0783 1.1374
2023-24 Soo Greyhounds OHL 68 24 18 42 0.618 0.3573 0.3598 1.6171 1.6283
2024-25 Soo Greyhounds OHL 68 28 26 54 0.794 0.4594 0.4389 2.0793 1.9863
2025-26 Soo Greyhounds OHL 24 6 4 10 0.417 0.2411 0.2182 1.0911 0.9875
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13214
Forward overall
#642
Forward born in 2005
#625
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Besinger
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Francis Rose
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.