IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Odin Vauhkonen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-16 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 65 3 20 23 0.354 0.1721 0.1837 0.8681 0.9267
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8840
Defenseman overall
#533
Defenseman born in 2008
#1089
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Corey Schueneman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matthew Biotti
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.07
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Mason Langenbrunner
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.03
actual FR PPG at Harvard
John Fusco
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Christian Jimenez
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2006-07
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2000-01
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.