← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Olsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-03 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 51 10 20 30 0.588 0.1507 0.1634 0.4434 0.4808
2024-25 BCHL 48 2 8 10 0.208 0.0803 0.0821 0.3031 0.3099
2025-26 Kamloops Blazers WHL 65 2 15 17 0.262 0.1272 0.1202 0.6416 0.6061
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13792
Defenseman overall
#2543
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2023-24
0.34
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
USHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2011-12
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.