← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Meehan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-20 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #140  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dexter NE-Prep 30 7 15 22 0.733 0.2069 0.2069 0.3356 0.3356
2019-20 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 25 8 10 18 0.720 0.4426 0.4426 2.1213 2.1213
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast GR 36 3 14 17 0.472
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 25 1 11 12 0.480
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 34 4 13 17 0.500
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 33 5 9 14 0.424
2020-21 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 17 0 8 8 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2020-21 · UMass Lowell
+141.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
90%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2339
Defenseman overall
#533
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.