IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabe Blanchard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 22 4 7 11 0.500 0.1411 0.1411 0.2288 0.2288
2019-20 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 45 4 7 11 0.244 0.1502 0.1502 0.7201 0.7201
2020-21 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 48 5 7 12 0.250 0.1537 0.1537 0.7366 0.7366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 38 0 6 6 0.158
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 12 0 1 1 0.083
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 34 2 3 5 0.147
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10688
Defenseman overall
#1946
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2002-03
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Gard
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gardiner
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.