← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristen Buckley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-19 Country: Canada
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 53 6 9 15 0.283 0.1090 0.1208 0.4118 0.4562
2025-26 Spokane Chiefs WHL 46 6 7 13 0.283 0.1375 0.1417 0.6934 0.7144
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41841
Forward overall
#1772
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.39
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.42
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.36
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.78
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2006-07
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.