IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henri Ament Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-01-12 Country: USA
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Everett Silvertips WHL 45 4 1 5 0.111 0.0541 0.0532 0.2714 0.2669
2026-27 Everett Silvertips WHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1946 0.1946 0.9771 0.9771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57420
Forward overall
#2986
Forward born in 2007
#1845
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan Walsh
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sullivan Mack
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Chase Brakel
MJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Louie Wehmann
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kolb
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chuck Costello
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.