IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sullivan Mack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kimball Union NE-Prep 36 19 10 29 0.806 0.1596 0.1596 0.3670 0.3670
2019-20 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 20 10 16 26 1.300 0.5009 0.5009 1.8919 1.8919
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 32 9 15 24 0.750
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 29 7 10 17 0.586
2022-23 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 25 6 4 10 0.400
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 20 1 1 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2021-22 · Cornell
-26.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10297
Forward overall
#429
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.