← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Westlund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 13 4 2 6 0.462 0.0579 0.0635 0.1457 0.1598
2018-19 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 14 5 5 10 0.714 0.0896 0.0936 0.2255 0.2355
2019-20 Minot Minotauros NAHL 45 8 18 26 0.578 0.2123 0.2123 0.6099 0.6099
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 47 11 18 29 0.617 0.2267 0.2267 0.6512 0.6512
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC 10 0 2 2 0.200
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC 18 2 3 5 0.278
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC 10 2 4 6 0.600
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 23 5 7 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2021-22 · Gustavus Adolphus
+647.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
90%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24855
Forward overall
#1178
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2003-04
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2016-17
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.