IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Oberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Gillette Wild NA3HL 26 5 13 18 0.692 0.0869 0.0956 0.2186 0.2405
2016-17 Gillette Wild NA3HL 42 21 33 54 1.286 0.1614 0.1694 0.4059 0.4260
2017-18 Gillette Wild NA3HL 46 25 54 79 1.717 0.2155 0.2152 0.5422 0.5416
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Salem State D1 MASCAC FR 11 2 0 2 0.182
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 11 2 0 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2018-19 · Salem State
+7.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15229
Forward overall
#705
Forward born in 1998
#226
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Gilreath
Amherst · 2014-15
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefan Seel
Concordia · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.