IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hubert Clarke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-12-17 Country: Canada
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Minot Minotauros NAHL 44 0 3 3 0.068 0.0251 0.0282 0.0720 0.0810
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 32 1 4 5 0.156 0.0760 0.0783 0.3833 0.3948
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24957
Defenseman overall
#2910
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Grady Gallatin
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Luke Bafia
NAHL 2013-14
0.27
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Carson Vance
NAHL 2013-14
0.04
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Kale Bennett
BCHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Zane Kindrachuk
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Talan Plante
Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shael Hechter
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.