IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Burick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-09 Country: USA
2026 · Round 3, Pick #95  ·  Vegas Golden Knights Vegas Golden Knights
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Penticton Vees WHL 50 0 4 4 0.080 0.0389 0.0402 0.1963 0.2028
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28191
Defenseman overall
#1434
Defenseman born in 2008
#1848
in WHL

D1 Comparables

David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alec Whipple
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Denver
Griffin Mendel
BCHL 2016-17
0.09
actual FR PPG at Denver
Blake Hillman
USHL 2013-14
0.28
actual FR PPG at Denver
Michael Davies
USHL 2014-15
0.39
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Jack DeMoura
Albertus Magnus · 2021-22
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Quesnel
SUNY Potsdam · 2018-19
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Triggs
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.