IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Booker Toninato Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-30 Country: USA
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Penticton Vees WHL 19 2 1 3 0.158 0.0768 0.0805 0.3874 0.4062
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#52588
Forward overall
#1128
Forward born in 2008
#1656
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick Hutchison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kiefer Sherwood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brendan Studioso
NA3HL 2016-17
0.33
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Filips Buncis
USHL 2014-15
0.05
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Teddy Lagerback
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Braxton Whitehead
WHL 2021-22
0.06
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Moher
Amherst · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Iwanski
Hamilton · 2006-07
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kubitz
Bethel · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.