← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaslo Ferner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-14 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.2890 0.3237 1.0915 1.2225
2023-24 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 53 4 11 15 0.283 0.1090 0.1171 0.4118 0.4423
2024-25 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 36 18 8 26 0.722 0.2783 0.2849 1.0510 1.0760
2025-26 Spokane Chiefs WHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0541 0.0512 0.2726 0.2579
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14871
Forward overall
#590
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Vermont
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Vermont
NAHL 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Assumption · 2022-23
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2017-18
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.