← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Dach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 14 13 10 23 1.643 0.2149 0.2106 0.5576 0.5463
2023-24 Boston Dogs EHL 44 10 21 31 0.705 0.1627 0.1559 0.3447 0.3303
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo ACHA_D1 14 5 5 10 0.714
2024-25 Assumption D2 NE10 19 2 1 3 0.158
2024-25 Buffalo ACHA_D1 14 5 5 10 0.714
2023-24 Buffalo ACHA_D1 14 5 5 10 0.714
2022-23 Buffalo ACHA_D1 14 5 5 10 0.714
2021-22 Buffalo ACHA_D1 14 5 5 10 0.714
2020-21 Buffalo ACHA_D1 14 5 5 10 0.714

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15061
Forward overall
#732
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.