← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Wiczek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-23 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 NMH NE-Prep 32 9 15 24 0.750 0.1508 0.1508 0.3430 0.3430
2024-25 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 52 6 5 11 0.211 0.0777 0.0804 0.2235 0.2312
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2026-27 Surrey Eagles BCHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0642 0.0642 0.2424 0.2424
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41275
Forward overall
#2463
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.63
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2024-25
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.