← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Wiczek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-23 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 NMH NE-Prep 32 9 15 24 0.750 0.1486 0.1486 0.3417 0.3417
2024-25 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 52 6 5 11 0.211 0.0777 0.0804 0.2232 0.2308
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40742
Forward overall
#2433
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.08
actual FR PPG at Army
USHL 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
USHL 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2018-19
0.59
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.