← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Gibbons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-21 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brunswick NE-Prep 28 11 11 22 0.786 0.1556 0.1556 0.3580 0.3580
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 29 6 8 14 0.483 0.0956 0.0956 0.2200 0.2200
2023-24 Brunswick NE-Prep 32 6 9 15 0.469 0.0929 0.0929 0.2136 0.2136
2024-25 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 46 9 18 27 0.587 0.2157 0.2176 0.6196 0.6250
2025-26 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 52 29 30 59 1.135 0.4169 0.4000 1.1976 1.1492
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14912
Forward overall
#758
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2024-25
0.40
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2018-19
0.42
actual FR PPG at Army
BCHL 2022-23
0.49
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2016-17
0.18
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.