IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Krueger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 56 8 9 17 0.304 0.1115 0.1165 0.3204 0.3347
2015-16 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 13 14 27 0.466 0.1710 0.1710 0.4913 0.4914
2016-17 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 60 22 34 56 0.933 0.3429 0.3244 0.9851 0.9319
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Army D1 AHA SR 21 5 14 19 0.905
2019-20 Army D1 AHA JR 30 9 9 18 0.600
2018-19 Army D1 AHA SO 34 10 9 19 0.559
2017-18 Army D1 AHA FR 28 2 3 5 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2017-18 · Army
-20.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20476
Forward overall
#809
Forward born in 1996
#1373
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taurin Haddon-Harris
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Enmark
Curry · 2005-06
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.