← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Keranen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Delano High USHS-MN 25 13 19 32 1.280 0.1620 0.1659 0.3109 0.3184
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 8 1 2 3 0.375 0.1378 0.1449 0.3958 0.4162
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 55 13 16 29 0.527 0.1937 0.1941 0.5566 0.5577
2018-19 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 51 22 24 46 0.902 0.3314 0.3173 0.9521 0.9115
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Army D1 AHA SR 36 11 17 28 0.778
2021-22 Army D1 AHA JR 35 7 7 14 0.400
2020-21 Army D1 AHA SO 22 0 4 4 0.182
2019-20 Army D1 AHA FR 33 2 12 14 0.424
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · Army
+84.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15126
Forward overall
#702
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2006-07
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2023-24
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.