IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kellen Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Roseau USHS-MN 28 6 16 22 0.786 0.0995 0.0995 0.1908 0.1908
2020-21 Roseau USHS-MN 21 6 18 24 1.143 0.1447 0.1447 0.2775 0.2775
2021-22 Chippewa Steel NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Maine Nordiques NAHL 55 17 23 40 0.727 0.2672 0.2759 0.7687 0.7936
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 60 25 29 54 0.900 0.3307 0.3256 0.9512 0.9366
2024-25 Maine Nordiques NAHL 23 10 10 20 0.870 0.3195 0.2978 0.9191 0.8567
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Army D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13047
Forward overall
#608
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Parsons
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry McKinney
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Prappas
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.