IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Gleason Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-30 Country: USA
2008 · Round 6, Pick #192  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 5 16 21 0.356 0.2099 0.2114 1.0689 1.0767
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig SR 41 5 13 18 0.439
2011-12 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig JR 41 0 15 15 0.366
2010-11 North Dakota D1 WCHA-orig — 22 1 3 4 0.182
2009-10 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 39 0 9 9 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2009-10 · North Dakota
+15.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5870
Defenseman overall
#954
Defenseman born in 1990
#2477
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Armour
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Mulera
Salve Regina · 2017-18
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.