← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philippe Fontaine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-02-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 61 5 14 19 0.311 0.1549 0.1691 0.8308 0.9067
2008-09 QMJHL 58 9 9 18 0.310 0.1543 0.1604 0.8276 0.8605
2009-10 Montréal Juniors QMJHL 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0648 0.0641 0.3478 0.3440
2010-11 Montréal Juniors QMJHL 60 11 11 22 0.367 0.1823 0.1712 0.9780 0.9183
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

NCAAe Rankings

#38858
Forward overall
#1350
Forward born in 1991
#1871
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2000-01
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.