| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Cape Breton Eagles | QMJHL | 61 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.311 | 0.1530 | 0.1670 | 0.8318 | 0.9078 |
| 2008-09 | — | QMJHL | 58 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0.310 | 0.1525 | 0.1586 | 0.8286 | 0.8615 |
| 2009-10 | Montréal Juniors | QMJHL | 23 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.130 | 0.0641 | 0.0634 | 0.3482 | 0.3444 |
| 2010-11 | Montréal Juniors | QMJHL | 60 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 0.367 | 0.1802 | 0.1692 | 0.9792 | 0.9194 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.