← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Hirshorn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2006-07-21 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2025-26 BCHL 22 11 8 90.2% 2.83 1 0.9990 90.1%
2024-25 NAHL 30 7 17 90.0% 3.49 2 0.9843 92.2%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Aksel Reid NAHL 91.1% 90.1% Union 80.0% 2.77
Connor McDonough NAHL 90.9% 90.1% Ferris State 25.0% 26.21
Zack Rose BCHL 90.6% 89.2% Bowling Green 90.5% 2.20
Roan Clarke BCHL 90.8% 89.9% Dartmouth 86.0% 3.93
Jared Moe USHL 90.7% 88.1% Minnesota 91.5% 2.46
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Ryan Kenny USPHL-Premier 93.5% 89.9% Stevenson D3 89.6% 2.95
Ryan Nolan NAHL 88.9% 90.6% St. Olaf D3 93.5% 2.31
Brody Haynes NCDC 92.5% 92.3% Elmira D3 94.8% 1.22
Marko Belak MJHL 90.3% 91.0% Gustavus Adolphus D3 87.8% 3.08
Primo Baldassarre NCDC 92.8% 92.7% Connecticut College D3 87.1% 4.43

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.