IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Primo Baldassarre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2004-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 — NCDC 24 11 12 92.8% 2.66 6 0.9400 87.4%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 6 — — 92.0% 2.87 0
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 2 1 1 87.1% 4.43 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Zack Rose BCHL 90.6% 88.0% Bowling Green 90.5% 2.20
Jared Moe USHL 90.7% 85.9% Minnesota 91.5% 2.46
Jacob Biron CCHL 90.9% 86.1% Army 92.3% 1.68
Matt Radomsky MJHL 92.9% 87.8% Holy Cross 90.3% 2.90
Evan Fear USHL 90.8% 85.7% Quinnipiac 77.4% 6.56
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Tyler Fromolz NA3HL 92.0% 87.1% Marian D3 88.3% 3.85
Jarret Bovarnick EHL 88.3% 87.8% Suffolk D3 87.2% 4.52
Ryan Kenny USPHL-Premier 93.5% 89.3% Stevenson D3 89.6% 2.95
Andrew Doran NA3HL 93.4% 87.1% Utica D3 100.0% —
Zach Dosan NA3HL 92.1% 87.8% Gustavus Adolphus D3 72.5% 6.60

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.