IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bischel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — USHL 55 28 20 90.5% 2.55 2 0.9983 87.8%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 36 15 19 92.4% 2.58 3
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 37 16 16 93.1% 2.39 5
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 16 10 4 92.4% 2.08 —
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 9 3 4 89.0% 2.87 0
2019-20 Notre Dame D1 7 3 1 91.5% 2.52 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Evan Fear USHL 90.8% 88.1% Quinnipiac 77.4% 6.56
Nathan Krawchuk OHL 90.1% 87.3% RPI 90.9% 2.82
Jared Moe USHL 90.7% 88.1% Minnesota 91.5% 2.46
Zack Rose BCHL 90.6% 89.2% Bowling Green 90.5% 2.20
Jack Stark USHL 90.0% 87.0% Yale 91.9% 2.22
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jarret Bovarnick EHL 88.3% 87.5% Suffolk D3 87.2% 4.52
Tyler Fromolz NA3HL 92.0% 86.3% Marian D3 88.3% 3.85
Andrew Doran NA3HL 93.4% 87.0% Utica D3 100.0% —
Ryan Kenny USPHL-Premier 93.5% 89.9% Stevenson D3 89.6% 2.95
Cameron Kuntar NCDC 89.3% 89.1% Chatham D3 92.4% 2.62

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.