IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Radomsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 1999-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
—
Goals Against Average
—
Base SV% —
Year Adj —
Source —
Confidence —
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  ■ Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2018-19 — MJHL 40 27 12 92.9% 2.06 6 0.9700 87.8%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 34 22 10 91.6% 2.05 2
2021-22 Holy Cross D1 24 8 14 90.6% 2.47 1
2020-21 Holy Cross D1 6 0 5 87.0% 4.03 0
2019-20 Holy Cross D1 34 11 18 90.3% 2.90 2
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Zack Rose BCHL 90.6% 88.0% Bowling Green 90.5% 2.20
Matej Marinov USHL 91.7% 85.9% Quinnipiac 91.3% 1.85
Aidan Porter BCHL 90.8% 87.4% Princeton 86.2% 3.99
Max Väyrynen SM-Liiga-Jr 91.2% 85.5% Michigan Tech 90.3% 2.32
Evan Fear USHL 90.8% 85.7% Quinnipiac 77.4% 6.56
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Jarret Bovarnick EHL 88.3% 87.8% Suffolk D3 87.2% 4.52
Tyler Fromolz NA3HL 92.0% 87.1% Marian D3 88.3% 3.85
Andrew Doran NA3HL 93.4% 87.1% Utica D3 100.0% —
Cameron Kuntar NCDC 89.3% 89.1% Chatham D3 92.4% 2.62
Ryan Kenny USPHL-Premier 93.5% 89.3% Stevenson D3 89.6% 2.95

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.