← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Ronan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Goalie DOB: 2003-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence

NCAA D3 / D2

Save % Equivalency
Goals Against Average
Base SV%
Year Adj
Source
Confidence
Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw SV%  ·  Solid blue = age-adj SVe%  ·  Green = actual college SV%
Goalie Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP W L SV% GAA SO SVe Factor Age-Adj SV%
2023-24 NAHL 29 17 6 90.7% 2.35 3 0.9843 83.1%
2022-23 NCDC 30 16 6 90.2% 2.95 1 0.9400 85.1%
SVe Factor = save% equivalency relative to NCAA D1 average  ·  COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div GP W L SV% GAA SO
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 1 0 0 100.0% 0
Goalie Comparables (D1)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College NCAA SV% NCAA GAA
Owen Say BCHL 92.3% 82.7% Mercyhurst 90.3% 3.39
Cooper Black BCHL 92.4% 82.9% Dartmouth 89.9% 3.07
William Gramme NAHL 91.9% 83.7% Wisconsin 95.9% 1.13
Brendan Holahan NAHL 89.7% 82.1% Union 85.7% 4.48
Justen Close SJHL 92.8% 82.4% Minnesota 78.6% 6.09
Goalie Comparables (D2/D3)

Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.

Name Junior League Junior SV% Adj SVe College Div SV% GAA
Joseph Giacobbo CCHL 91.8% 82.8% Utica D3 95.3% 0.90
Tucker Hanson EHL 89.0% 83.9% Saint Anselm D2 100.0%
Sam Edmands USPHL-Premier 93.4% 83.0% Post D2 93.9% 2.10
Aiden Winslow USPHL-Premier 93.5% 83.2% Westfield State D3 92.7% 2.71
Cam Prodin USPHL-Premier 93.6% 81.8% Roger Williams D3 75.8% 9.18

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.