IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Courtemanche Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-04 Country: Canada
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 64 4 11 15 0.234 0.1152 0.1229 0.6258 0.6675
2012-13 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 57 2 10 12 0.210 0.1034 0.1049 0.5620 0.5702
2013-14 Rimouski Océanic QMJHL 55 9 8 17 0.309 0.1519 0.1462 0.8252 0.7941
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

NCAAe Rankings

#41569
Forward overall
#1654
Forward born in 1994
#1235
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

James Shannon
BCHL 2023-24
0.37
actual FR PPG at Yale
David Chen
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Yale
Julian Frias
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Yale
Beanie Richter
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Wynia
Fredonia · 2009-10
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Cherniak
Lawrence · 2023-24
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Olson
Hobart · 2010-11
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.