← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Shannon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Brunswick NE-Prep 30 4 7 11 0.367 0.1034 0.1034 0.1678 0.1678
2021-22 Brunswick NE-Prep 28 17 19 36 1.286 0.3627 0.3627 0.5883 0.5883
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 29 6 5 11 0.379 0.1070 0.1070 0.1736 0.1736
2023-24 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 9 12 21 0.389 0.1449 0.1435 0.5667 0.5614
2024-25 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 17 29 46 0.852 0.3173 0.2984 1.2413 1.1672
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC 30 5 6 11 0.367
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2025-26 · Yale
+81.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25989
Forward overall
#1472
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.