IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Mayfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-10-14 Country: USA
2011 · Round 2, Pick #34  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 — USHL 59 10 12 22 0.373 0.2200 0.2355 1.1200 1.1989
2010-11 — USHL 52 7 9 16 0.308 0.1815 0.1851 0.9241 0.9426
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Denver D1 WCHA-orig SO 39 4 13 17 0.436
2011-12 Denver D1 WCHA-orig FR 42 3 9 12 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2011-12 · Denver
+47.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6542
Defenseman overall
#1026
Defenseman born in 1992
#2617
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Janke
Norwich · 2007-08
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Barker
Concordia · 2014-15
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.