← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Ella Erickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-11 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Sacred Heart
Verbal NEWHA D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.10
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1034
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.24
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2506
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencemedium
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
88%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Lovell Academy 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 59 3 11 14 0.237 0.0755 0.0774
2025-26 Lovell Academy 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 50 5 14 19 0.380 0.1210 0.1207
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota
Ebba Strandberg SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.333 Maine

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Bella Schmidt 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG 0.292 Suffolk NEHC
Brooklyn Riley 2024-25 · 0.37 PPG 0.806 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Paige Dale 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.370 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Anna Daniels 2010-11 · 0.32 PPG 0.870 Castleton NEHC
Sydney Mintz 2022-23 · 0.38 PPG 0.750 Utica UCHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.