← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Woodworth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 34 4 16 20 0.588 0.2890 0.2890 1.5707 1.5707
2021-22 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 68 16 34 50 0.735 0.3613 0.3783 1.9635 2.0560
2022-23 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 68 16 46 62 0.912 0.4480 0.4472 2.4348 2.4304
2023-24 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 62 21 41 62 1.000 0.4913 0.4662 2.6703 2.5338
2024-25 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 61 18 66 84 1.377 0.6765 0.6087 3.6770 3.3083
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 36 4 17 21 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.51
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
+13.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4517
Forward overall
#110
Forward born in 2004
#117
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.