← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Woodworth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 34 4 16 20 0.588 0.2929 0.2929 1.5694 1.5694
2021-22 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 68 16 34 50 0.735 0.3662 0.3835 1.9619 2.0543
2022-23 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 68 16 46 62 0.912 0.4541 0.4533 2.4329 2.4285
2023-24 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 62 21 41 62 1.000 0.4980 0.4725 2.6682 2.5318
2024-25 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 61 18 66 84 1.377 0.6857 0.6170 3.6741 3.3057
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 36 4 17 21 0.583
2025-26 Omaha D1 NCHC 36 4 17 21 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2025-26 · Nebraska Omaha
+12.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1632
Forward overall
#59
Forward born in 2004
#148
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.