IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Gaul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 51 21 18 39 0.765 0.2565 0.2468 0.7087 0.6819
2024-25 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 8 3 2 5 0.625 0.2096 0.1905 0.5792 0.5265
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC — 24 3 2 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2025-26 · Williams
+9.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20660
Forward overall
#1117
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Hurd
Tufts · 2021-22
1.087 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keegan Bruce
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hanewall
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.