← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Bourque Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-26 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 42 6 14 20 0.476 0.2340 0.2585 1.2716 1.4046
2022-23 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 57 12 11 23 0.404 0.1982 0.2092 1.0775 1.1375
2023-24 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 66 18 15 33 0.500 0.2457 0.2473 1.3352 1.3437
2024-25 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 64 15 21 36 0.562 0.2764 0.2646 1.5020 1.4378
2025-26 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 57 21 21 42 0.737 0.3620 0.3294 1.9675 1.7904
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15355
Forward overall
#790
Forward born in 2005
#532
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2014-15
0.15
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.