← New Search ↗ Social Card

Axel Dufresne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-10 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 60 4 12 16 0.267 0.1310 0.1380 0.7122 0.7503
2023-24 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 65 4 18 22 0.339 0.1663 0.1670 0.9039 0.9077
2024-25 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 55 10 17 27 0.491 0.2412 0.2304 1.3109 1.2520
2025-26 Rouyn-Noranda Huskies QMJHL 46 7 21 28 0.609 0.2991 0.2715 1.6254 1.4755
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4546
Defenseman overall
#1170
Defenseman born in 2005
#673
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2016-17
0.11
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
QMJHL 2024-25
0.16
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
NAHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.19
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2009-10
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2023-24
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.