IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor McCarthy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 56 6 17 23 0.411 0.1582 0.1544 0.5977 0.5833
2016-17 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 54 13 23 36 0.667 0.2569 0.2376 0.9702 0.8973
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 34 9 11 20 0.588
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 39 4 10 14 0.359
2017-18 Clarkson D1 ECAC — 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2017-18 · Clarkson
-42.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6354
Defenseman overall
#1117
Defenseman born in 1996
#1447
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Nuzzolilo
Framingham State · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Duszynski
Norwich · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.