← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Romeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-24 Country: Canada
RIT
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 64 15 15 30 0.469 0.2303 0.2411 1.2518 1.3108
2023-24 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 54 25 7 32 0.593 0.2911 0.2904 1.5824 1.5788
2024-25 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 59 14 11 25 0.424 0.2082 0.1975 1.1314 1.0732
2025-26 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 61 16 16 32 0.525 0.2577 0.2323 1.4008 1.2626
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21517
Forward overall
#1178
Forward born in 2005
#681
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

RIT Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OJHL 2015-16
0.25
actual FR PPG at RIT
BCHL 2024-25
0.47
actual FR PPG at RIT
OJHL 2018-19
0.42
actual FR PPG at RIT
AJHL 2012-13
0.35
actual FR PPG at RIT

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.