← New Search ↗ Social Card

Émile Guité Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-31 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 5, Pick #159  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
New Hampshire
Verbal HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 61 25 32 57 0.934 0.4591 0.5082 2.4945 2.7614
2024-25 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 59 16 14 30 0.508 0.2498 0.2642 1.3575 1.4360
2025-26 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 59 32 33 65 1.102 0.5413 0.5470 2.9411 2.9723
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8128
Forward overall
#169
Forward born in 2007
#303
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2014-15
0.46
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
SHL-J20 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NCDC 2020-21
0.57
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2015-16
0.56
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.