← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xavier Villeneuve Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-09-29 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 2, Pick #34  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 54 8 35 43 0.796 0.3912 0.4396 2.1264 2.3892
2024-25 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 61 12 50 62 1.016 0.4994 0.5365 2.7141 2.9160
2025-26 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 37 6 32 38 1.027 0.5046 0.5183 2.7424 2.8168
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1330
Defenseman overall
#105
Defenseman born in 2007
#226
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Boston College (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at Boston University
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.47
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2015-16
0.28
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2022-23
0.13
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.